Optimal Debt Mix and Priority Structure: The Role of Bargaining Power∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper examines the optimal priority structure and mix of bank and bond market debt within a continuous-time asset pricing framework. Closed-form expressions are derived for the values of renegotiable bank debt, non-renegotiable bond market debt, equity, and levered firm values. We show that the optimal debt structure hinges upon the ex post division of bargaining power between the firm and bank. The optimal debt structure for firms that are weak vis-à-vis the bank entails financing exclusively with bank debt. Strong firms find it optimal to issue a mix of bank and bond market debt, with the bank senior in the priority structure. The model explains: (i) why it is optimal for small firms to avoid public debt markets, (ii) why large firms employ mixed debt financing (iii) why banks are senior in the priority structure, and (iv) why firms shift from bank debt into a mixture of bond market and bank debt over their life-cycle. These predictions are generated within a tax shield-bankruptcy cost tradeoff model in which the only unique feature of banks is their ability to renegotiate. JEL Codes: G13, G32, G33.
منابع مشابه
The Optimal Mix of Bank and Market Debt: An Asset Pricing Approach∗
This paper examines the optimal mix and priority structure of bank and market debt using a tax shield-bankruptcy cost tradeoff model where the only unique feature of banks is their ability to renegotiate. Closed-form expressions are derived for the values of renegotiable bank debt, non-renegotiable market debt, equity, and levered firm values. Optimal debt structure hinges upon ex post bargaini...
متن کاملCan the Trade-off Theory Explain Debt Structure?
We examine the optimal mixture and priority structure of bank and market debt using a trade-off model in which banks have the unique ability to renegotiate outside formal bankruptcy. Flexible bank debt offers a superior trade-off between tax shields and bankruptcy costs. Ease of renegotiation limits bank debt capacity, however. Optimal debt structure hinges upon which party has bargaining power...
متن کاملCapital Structure as a Strategic Variable: Evidence from Collective Bargaining
Market power in the hands of a supplier — such as a labor union — affects a firm’s optimal debt policy. If a firm maintains a high level of liquidity, workers may be encouraged to raise wage demands. In the presence of external finance constraints, a firm has an incentive to use the cash flow demands of debt service payments to improve its bargaining position. Using both cross-sectional estimat...
متن کاملINSIDERS AND OUTSIDERS: The Choice between Informed and Arm's-length Debt
While the benefits of bank financing are relatively well understood, the costs are not. This paper argues that while informed banks make flexible financial decisions which prevent a firm's projects from going awry, the cost of this credit is that banks have bargaining power over the firm's profits, once projects have begun. The firm's portfolio choice of borrowing source and the choice of prior...
متن کاملCARESS Working Paper 02 - 07 Moral Hazard and Capital Structure Dynamics ∗
We base a contracting theory for a start-up firm on an agency model with observable but nonverifiable effort, and renegotiable contracts. Two essential restrictions on simple contracts are imposed: the entrepreneur must be given limited liability, and the investor’s earnings must not decrease in the realized profit of the firm. All message game contracts with pure strategy equilibria (and no th...
متن کامل